Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Amazon Alexa bled $10 billion in cash in 2022

Amazon Echo

Last updated

With Amazon Alexa reportedly responsible for $10 billion in expenses in 2022, teams working on the smart speaker are expected to see mass layoffs as a major cost-saving measure.

As a business, Amazon is known as one that is willing to take losses on the chin, in the pursuit of massive growth. While that has worked for the company so far, it appears that a pet project of founder Jeff Bezos is on the chopping block as Amazon attempts to rein in costs.

Amazon is expected to lay off around 10,000 employees, and while those job cuts will be all over the organization, one team that is set to be hit will be Amazon's "Worldwide Digital" unit, which covers products including the Echo smart speaker line, Alexa, and Prime Video. According to Business Insider, Alexa and general hardware teams are now the big focus of layoffs.

The targeting of the digital assistant and hardware teams is likely due to Worldwide Digital having an operating loss of over $3 billion in the first quarter of 2022, internal data indicates. A source clarified that the majority of the unit's losses were related to Alexa and other devices.

The unit's losses are the highest of all Amazon's arms, and is double that of its physical retail store and grocery business.

Worldwide Digital has been expensive for Amazon, with it costing the company approximately $5 billion in 2018, and it's on track to lose about $10 billion in 2022.

Part of the issue is that, under the control of Jeff Bezos, Amazon expected Echo devices and Alexa to recoup their cost and generate revenue by encouraging customers to place more orders verbally.

Under expectations of it initially being loss-making, as well as the original Echo selling over 5 million units in its first two years, the team swelled in 2016 to more than 10,000 employees. With it being a pet project of Bezos, the team also received more protection from internal changes that affected others.

Hey Alexa, the party is over

As time moved on, Amazon found that Alexa was used for a billion interactions a week, but since most were typical requests digital assistants get rather than directly product-related, there were fewer chances for monetization.

In 2019, hiring for the team froze, with it only backfilling roles rather than expanding further. Employees were also losing morale over the project, which wasn't helped by the hiring change.

That year, Amazon also focused more on the financial workings of Alexa, including hiring a team to track user behavior in relation to purchases and Prime subscriptions. The feedback was brutal, with employees revealing the results repeatedly fell short of were they needed to be.

Not long after, in 2020, Bezos started to lose interest in Alexa, with less involvement on marketing campaigns.

Sources now say the team is floundering on what kind of long-term strategy it could adopt, but with little impact. Hardware team members had planned on updated wireless headsets and an AR product, but the projects may not make it through Amazon's cost-cutting process.

With a preference to work on developing the $1,000 Astro home robot, the decision to chase more affluent customers reportedly caused some internal dissent.

The layoffs are almost certain to hit the teams, with David Limp, Amazon SVP of devices and services, confirming in a teamwide email that reports about team layoffs were true. "It pains me to have to deliver this news as we know we will lose talented Amazonians from the Devices & Services org as a result," Limp wrote.

While bad for the hardware and Alexa teams, the layoffs will be seen as helpful to those working on Apple's Siri, as well as teams working on augmented reality products. With Amazon's efforts reduced by mass layoffs, that reduces the threat of one of Apple's rivals, leaving Google as the main opponent in the digital assistant marketplace.

26 Comments

bloggerblog 17 Years · 2546 comments

Amazon lacks customer trust when it comes to handling data. I won’t be surprised if it got sold to police or governments. I don’t even trust their palm reader tech or Ring security system. 

1 Like · 0 Dislikes
22july2013 12 Years · 3789 comments

I'll take "Companies that can't make money because of their lack of respect for customer privacy," Alexa.

1 Like · 0 Dislikes
jayweiss 14 Years · 80 comments

Expect a new subscription for Alexa services which don’t generate income. Things like turning lights on and off.

5 Likes · 0 Dislikes
ihatescreennames 20 Years · 1995 comments

Amazon lacks customer trust when it comes to handling data. I won’t be surprised if it got sold to police or governments. I don’t even trust their palm reader tech or Ring security system. 

Is that actually true, though? I know plenty of people with some form of Echo in their house who also say they don’t care about their privacy or personal data. Any time I’ve mentioned Amazon’s mishandling of data to them they had no idea but also just shrug it off. 


The only place I really see any concern around handling of data or privacy is in these types of forums, which tends to be a more tech focused niche of people. Even this isn’t absolute. A friend of mine loves to refer to herself as a “techie-girl” and is one of those I mentioned above. 

So, is there really (much) lack of customer trust with Amazon?

4 Likes · 0 Dislikes
dewme 11 Years · 5929 comments

Good article. In my opinion the Alexa technology is at least a generation ahead of the best version of Siri, wherever that happens to reside, which is probably on the iPhone. It’s very apparent to me that Amazon has invested a ton of money into refinement Alexa technology in anticipation of the technology helping to drive sales both on its storefront and through preferred integration with other Amazon products.

If my use of Alexa technology is any indicator, I’d say that 99% of what I use the Alexa technology for has zero benefit to Amazon’s bottom line. The 1% is mostly the Alexa technology querying me for feedback on past product purchases or Amazon offering a product discount for ordering something using Alexa.

I don’t buy into the argument that Amazon investing less in Alexa technology is going to benefit Apple because just like Alexa, Siri isn’t driving product sales in a measurable way. It’s a convenience function that’s sadly far less capable than Alexa, but I seriously doubt that its monetization impact is even as good as Alexa’s. Perhaps the reason Siri technology seems so behind Alexa technology is because Apple is only investing in Siri technology at a level that is more commensurate with its ROI on the sales side of the equation. But even here I think Apple is eating a lot of costs just to keep the convenience factor in the products that use it. Unlike Amazon, Apple makes a gigaton of money on device sales while Amazon is probably selling a lot of its devices at a loss to pull through sales from other channels.

Hopefully Amazon will continue to invest in Alexa technology at a sustainable level. Even without any great advances the functionality of the Alexa technology will likely maintain its lead over semi-competing technologies like Siri for a few more years. I say semi-competing because neither technology is a drop-in replacement for the other. There are a few areas of overlap, like using Alexa with Apple Music, but for the most part these are two basically closed systems that play in their own ecosystems. The Alexa technology does have an API that third parties can integrate into their products, but it’s not displacing Siri technology in any of those cases because Siri is (as far as I know) exclusive to Apple products.

The Alexa technology is quite amazing and I’m sure that Amazon could find other product and system makers who would license it at a much deeper level if Amazon decided to open it up as a product.

4 Likes · 0 Dislikes